In 1996, a man from a neighboring town was convicted of kidnapping and rape and convicted to 27 years in prison. After six years of unsuccessful appeals, he contacted the Northern California Innocence Project and asked for help. In 2005, Peter Rose was exonerated of the crime based on DNA evidence obtained from the victim at the time of the crime.
A few days after Rose’s release, the rape victim (now 23 years old) contacted reporter Jeff Barker at the Stockton Record and recanted her 1994 identification of Rose. She told the reporter, “I’m not sure. I wasn’t sure,” and attributed her certainty on the witness stand at Rose’s trial to pressure by the police.
The young woman said she “went along with the police because they seemed to have evidence lined up against Rose.” (November 6, 2004, Stockton Record, Jeff Barker.)
Peter Rose was one of the lucky ones. In 1989, Texas executed Carlos de Luna, who proclaimed his innocence until the moment of his death; another man, Carlos Hernandez, has bragged that he committed the crime for which de Luna was executed. [Source]
“One would much rather that twenty guilty persons should escape the punishment of death, than that one innocent person should be condemned, and suffer capitally.” — Sir John Fortescue, De Laudibus Legum Angliae
It’s an interesting maxim, Blackstone’s formulation, and not one we’ve much lived by here in the United States. In the past, particularly in the cases of vigilante justice, it has been deemed better to remove a potential threat; this mindset directs our current war in Iraq. Our prisons are overflowing, as are death rows across the country; while undoubtedly many, if not most, prisoners are guilty, it is the few innocent that most suffer from our justice system, and the problem with capital punishment is that it is irreversible.
The Justice Project, in Washington D.C., and the Innocence Project, in New York, are two organizations founded to address unfairness in the justice system, particularly wrongful convictions. According to the Justice Project, over 100 people have been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death in the past thirty years. The Innocence Project has exonerated over 196 people, 14 sentenced to death; 70 percent are people of color, mostly black and Latino. [Source]
Up until now, though, these two projects and a handful of lawyers around the country have been working somewhat alone. However, the new district attorney of Dallas County, Texas has allowed the Innocence Project to begin a review of hundreds of cases.
Craig Watkins is still settling into his 11th-floor office overlooking the city skyline, hanging up pictures, arranging his plaques — and revolutionizing the criminal justice system he oversees.
Sworn in as Dallas County district attorney on Jan. 1 — he is the first elected black district attorney in Texas — Watkins fired or accepted the resignations of almost two dozen high-level white prosecutors and began hiring minorities and women.
And in an unprecedented act for any jurisdiction in the nation, he announced he would allow the Texas affiliate of the Innocence Project to review hundreds of Dallas County cases dating back to 1970 to decide whether DNA tests should be conducted to validate past convictions. At 12 in the past five years, Dallas has more post-conviction DNA exonerations than any county in the nation and more than at least two states. A 13th exoneration, of a Dallas County man, is expected to be announced within days. [Full story]
Law students in Fort Worth have already begun to review some cases. [Source]
This is a huge, huge step toward fixing a massive problem in the justice system. Many inmates, especially non-white inmates, have been convicted of crimes they did not commit, or charges that are above and beyond the crime. An official investigation by a governmental agency, even at the state level, and a move to address the inequality of hiring practices that may have led to these convictions is an enormous first step toward addressing that.
This may also lead to adopting some of the other goals of the Innocence Project and the Justice Project, namely preservation of evidence, criminal lab oversight, eyewitness reform, and new guidelines or even overturn of the death penalty.
Here’s hoping, anyway.


