I Need to Calm Down

  • Action Alerts

    jena_03.jpg

    pinoyhr.jpg

    australia.jpg

Archive for March 10th, 2007

The foods we eat

Posted by Vox on 10 March 2007

I have been reading a bit here and there about “decolonizing the diet” (sort of an oxymoron for me, since you have to go way, way, way back on my family tree to find any ancestors who are indigenous to the Americas). Not any extensive study! But a little bit.

I’m finding it pretty interesting. For example, one opinion I read talked about how in Mexico, in areas where people eat mostly whatever they can grow, people are much healthier and live longer, but when their relatives come to the U.S. and begin eating cheap food here (mostly processed crap), their health goes downhill fast.

I remember discussing this is one of my anthro classes, too, how many indigenous villages in Chiapas that are kind of isolated eat mainly from the land, and they tend to be much healthier than the places where tortilla factories and supermarkets have come in. There was also some discussion about beans, rice and corn; apparently, beans and corn work together to provide certain enzymes and proteins that beans and rice do not, so as areas stop eating corn and start eating rice, they start having more nutrition problems.

I’m also thinking about back in my AOL days, a lot of folks on the pagan boards used to talk about paleo diets. That’s not really realistic for me, since they involve a healthy amount of meat, but some of the suggestions are good, like cutting out enriched flour, processed sugar, and most potatoes. (Sweet potatoes and yams are okay, Idaho varieties not so much. Something about starches and acids building up in your system, I don’t really remember.)

Anyway, I was thinking about this and about how at one of the forums I visit people were discussing decolonizing the diet, and I’ve kind of been thinking of trying it. I have some health problems, and I am beginning to wonder how much the crap I eat exacerbates or even causes them. I’ve been eating “healthier,” but it’s still a lot of processed food, frozen veggies and canned fruits, frozen teriyaki bowls and canned chili. It’s healthier, but it’s still processed.

I’m not going to cut out processed foods entirely — I’m a vegetarian, so I get all of my protein from beans and peanut butter and soy, and I can only switch to unprocessed beans, feasibly — and I’m not giving up my diet sodas, though I will try to cut back to after I’ve had plenty of water. Yes, I’m addicted to Diet Dr Pepper.

What I will do, though, is this. It’s getting warmer, so the fruit stands will open and the farmer’s market will be starting up again in a month or so, and the flea market one town up sells some produce, too. And they’re as cheap as or cheaper than the grocery store. So I’ll be trying to get most of my fruits and veggies from those, and eating fresh (more nutrients, less pesticides and preservatives). I am going to try and cut out as much white flour, white potatoes and processed sugar as possible, so that, at most, I’m having some once or twice a week. It’s not like I can’t get organic wheat and corn flours and raw sugar, and I eat way too many potatoes anyway. I’m also going to do a little research on which foods go well together and which don’t, so that I can try to plan my diet accordingly. This will be gradual, as I can’t stand the idea of wasting food and I have a lot of crap in my cupboards, like Girl Scout cookies. Which I can’t eat right now because of Lent.

This is not going to be easy at all. I have no willpower. Seriously, as I’m writing this, I’m eating Tostitos and bean dip. But I think I can do it. I gave up sugar once before for a year and a half; I’ve never caved during Lent and I always give up food. It’s obviously possible for me. I think I may need a support group, though!

Posted in Health | 1 Comment »

Two things

Posted by Vox on 10 March 2007

A. The blogroll has been sort of updated. I need to figure out how to organize it.

Anyway, those are the blogs I read daily via the feed reader, LiveJournals excluded. So if you know of a blog I’m not reading that I should be, let me know in comments! Thanks.

B. No clue if it’s true or not, but I just got an email forward that The Breast Cancer Site is having trouble meeting its click quota so that it can provide one free mammogram per day. If it’s true, they need help, and if it isn’t true, clicking won’t hurt! So drop by and click, because it’s free and takes about 30 seconds of your time, and it can help save a woman’s life.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Link Roundup: 10 March 2007

Posted by Vox on 10 March 2007

Blog Links
About “Positive” Stereotyping and Fighting Oppression — “And yes, positive stereotypes are just as bigoted as negative ones because for some ’special reason,’ you’re not considered fully human. Human beings make mistakes, fall on hard times, need assistance just as much as they make history, enjoy the finer things, and are capable of taking care of themselves.” [This is a really good analysis of "model minority" myths vs. negative stereotypes.]

Evolutions of Doctrine — ”So not only has the December coup moved 6,000,000 people from one side of the poverty line to the other, wasted over trillion dollars and at least 30,000 lives and limbs (mental health affects not included) in Iraq, inflicted over half-a-million deaths and 2,400,000 evictions among the Iraqis, it has also caused the People’s Republic of China to increase its military budget by 15%, and now the former Soviet Union to adopt a new defense doctrine.”

News Links
Between Black and Immigrant Muslims, an Uneasy Alliance — “Only 28 miles separate Imam Talib’s mosque in Harlem from the Islamic Center of Long Island. The congregations they serve — African-Americans at the city mosque and immigrants of South Asian and Arab descent in the suburbs — represent the largest Muslim populations in the United States. Yet a vast gulf divides them, one marked by race and class, culture and history.”

Guatemalan Priests Plan to Purify Sacred Site, Eliminate ‘Bad Spirits’ After Bush Visit — “‘That a person like (Bush), with the persecution of our migrant brothers in the United States, with the wars he has provoked, is going to walk in our sacred lands, is an offense for the Mayan people and their culture,’ Juan Tiney, the director of a Mayan nongovernmental organization with close ties to Mayan religious and political leaders, said Thursday.” [I admit it, I giggled a little. Not at the fact that they're purifying the site, at the fact that Bush is so damned clueless.]

Disabled woman is able ally for parents — “(Carrie Ann Lucas) is one of a handful of attorneys in the country whose specialty is representing disabled parents like herself. Her mission: making sure they get the same chance as everyone else to be moms and dads.” [The headline is bad! Bad! No, really, she's not an ally, she's a parent and an activist, and she helps fellow disabled parents. The head makes it look like she helps able-bodied parents as their good buddy. I would have written "Disabled mom is active in fight for rights" or something. I hate bad headlines. The article is good, though, aside from its subtle tone of "Wow, disabled people can lead meaningful lives." Which, honestly, is pretty standard in most articles profiling people with disabilities.]

Posted in News Roundup | 2 Comments »

Song of the South vs. Peter Pan

Posted by Vox on 10 March 2007

When I was … oh, probably about four, since the last theatrical run was in 1986, though I would have sworn I was in school already, my mom got a summer “season pass” to go see the Disney classics in the theater. I thought it was the same summer Oliver & Company was released, but that was 1988, so I’m all confused, obviously.

Anyway, we saw Cinderella, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, Bambi, Peter Pan and Song of the South. The first three were pretty standard Disney Princess fare. Bambi was, of course, Bambi.

It’s the latter two I want to talk about, though. At the time, I didn’t realize there was anything wrong with either of them. I do remember mostly thinking the song from Peter Pan, “What Makes the Red Man Red?” was dumb, but I don’t think it was the racism in it. I don’t think I was old enough to recognize it then. Song of the South I honestly don’t remember, mostly. I remember liking Brer Rabbit, and asking my mom why Toby hadn’t gone to that other boy’s birthday. (I didn’t like the main character much. I was just as impatient as a kid as I am now, and he annoyed me badly.)

That was when my mom awkwardly tried to explain racism to me. I don’t remember the gist of the conversation, unfortunately. I do remember that this was the only movie that Mom had not seen before, and I vaguely remember her leaning over to explain certain parts to me.

Now, though, I read an article that Song of the South was last seen in theaters in 1986, and has never been — and never will be — released on video or DVD. This is also on Wikipedia and Snopes, along with the reasoning.

While I’ve always been more in favor of keeping offensive-but-important media and images around for educational purposes and simply deconstructing them, I can’t say I blame people for being glad. While it can be argued that Song of the South was rather progressive for its time, it still contains some subtle racism and racist ideas, intentional or not, and some viewers might get the wrong ideas from them.

Peter Pan, on the other hand, is currently available via Amazon.com. Several versions, in fact. And, while (from what I remember and have read) most of the racism in Song of the South is subtle, the racism in Peter Pan is quite blatantly obvious. In fact, a friend and I have dubbed “What Makes the Red Man Red?” the most offensive Disney song ever to be written, and perhaps the least politically correct tune in the universe. Peter Pan’s Indians speak in broken English, say “How” and “Ug,” call their “princess” a “squaw,” they’re deliberately created as stupid/ignorant yet sneaky. Every stereotype about Native Americans is worked in there somehow, and the white Lost Boys, young though they are, can easily get the better of the “savages.”

So why has Disney kept Peter Pan in circulation but removed Song of the South? Why is Song of the South listed among the ten most politically incorrect comedies of all time, when Peter Pan doesn’t get a mention?
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Movies, Race | 2 Comments »